home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
aug94.doc
/
000005_owner-lightwave-l _Mon Aug 1 07:22:44 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id GAA17129; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 06:36:37 -0700
Received: from hpfcla.fc.hp.com by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom) id GAA17112; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 06:36:31 -0700
Received: from hpfcogv.fc.hp.com by hpfcla.fc.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.4/15.5+IOS 3.20) id AA06654; Mon, 1 Aug 94 07:35:57 -0600
Received: by hpfcogv.fc.hp.com (1.37.109.4/15.5+IOS 3.22) id AA26948; Mon, 1 Aug 94 07:36:03 -0600
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 07:36:03 -0600
From: Steve Koren <koren@hpfcogv.fc.hp.com>
Message-Id: <9408011336.AA26948@hpfcogv.fc.hp.com>
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: time samples of Raptor
X-Phase-Of-Moon: the moon is waning crescent (31% illuminated)
In-Reply-To: <009824DB.01D51800.150@tanuki.twics.com>
References: <009824DB.01D51800.150@tanuki.twics.com>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
> Here are rendering times by Raptor...
> A4000/040/25mh A2000/040/33mh A4000 A4000
> +Raptor +RaptorPlus
> SpaceFighters.scn 1min.10sec. 20sec. 33sec. 28sec.
> frame 130 =70sec.
^^^^^^^^^
Is this right? The 040/33 was faster than both the Raptors on this
test? On the other hand LogoLoop is quite a bit different:
> LogoLoop.scn 21min.37sec. 17min.55sec. 2mi.51se. 1mi.40se.
> frame 150(MidRes) =1297sec. =1075sec. =171sec. =100sec.
At any rate, I wonder how the 060/66 will rank in here. It is supposed
to give about 3 to 4X the performance of an 040/33. Might be a "poor
man's Raptor" - not as fast, but a lot cheaper.
- steve